PROFESSIONAL ACADEMIC STUDY RESOURCES WEBSITE +1 813 434 1028  proexpertwritings@hotmail.com

ORDER NOW

Capital Budgeting Techniques Case Study

Capital Budgeting Techniques Case Study
Order ID 53563633773
Type Essay
Writer Level Masters
Style APA
Sources/References 4
Perfect Number of Pages to Order 5-10 Pages
Description/Paper Instructions

Capital Budgeting Techniques Case Study

Details of Capital Budgeting Techniques Case Study

McCormick Plant Proposal

As you know from Project 4, McCormick & Company is considering building a new factory in Largo, Maryland. McCormick & Company decided to offer $4,424,000 to obtain the land for this project.  The new factory will require an initial investment of $350 million to build the new plant and purchase equipment.

You have been asked to continue your work from project 4 with a full analysis of the proposed factory, including the start-up costs, the projected net cash flows from operations, the tax impact of depreciation, and the cash flow impacts of changes in working capital.

The investment will be depreciated as a modified accelerated cost recovery system (MACRS) seven-year class asset. The correct depreciation table is included below.

The company will need to finance some of the cash to fund $17 million in accounts receivable and $14 million in Inventory starting at year zero.  The company expects vendors to give free credit on purchases of $15 million (accounts payable).  The CFO wants you to consider the net cash outflows for working capital as well as the cash outflows for the plant, equipment, and land in year zero.

Note:  The $17 million for accounts receivable and the $14 million for Inventory are cash outflows.  The $15 million for accounts payable is a cash inflow.

The CFO has indicated that this net working capital will be recovered as a cash inflow in year 21.  She also estimates that the company will be able to sell the factory, equipment, and land in year 21 for $40 million.

The company estimates that the cash flows from operations will be as shown in Table 2.  Note:  Only the cash flows related to operations (years 1-20) will generate accounting profits and thus taxable income (or losses).

Use the WACC that you recommended in question 5 of the Cost of Capital tab for the discount rate.

Capital Budgeting Techniques Case Study Questions:

  1. What will be the depreciation for tax purposes each year? Complete Table 1 below to answer this question. Note: the total deprecation for tax purposes will be $350 million.
  2. Create an after-tax cash flow timeline for the proposed factory in Table 2 below. Note: The CFO estimates that operations for the company will be profitable on an on-going basis. As a result, any accounting loss on this specific project will provide a tax benefit for the company overall in the year of the loss.
  3. Calculate the NPV and IRR using the data from Table 2. Should the project be accepted?

The following questions will be used to assist in evaluating the proposed project’s risk.

  1. The CFO is particularly concerned about the potential impact of future tax increases and that the expenses may have been systematically understated. In order to undertake an objective evaluation of the project’s risk, she asks you to prepare a second analysis with a less favorable set of assumptions. She asks, “What would happen to the NPV and IRR calculations if the cash outflow for expenses comes in 2% higher than estimated for the entire life of the project and if the tax rate increases to 50% (combined Federal and Maryland state rates) starting in year 4?”  Create an after-tax cash flow timeline for the proposed factory with these new assumptions in Table 3 below.
  2. Calculate the NPV and IRR using the data from Table 3.
  3. Considering all of your work in questions 1 through 5, should the project be accepted? Discuss the risk and the potential reward of this project for McCormick.

Capital Budgeting Techniques Case Study

Answer Questions Below:
Table 1
MACRS
Depreciation $350
Year 7 Year class Depreciation (in millions)
1 14.29%  $            50.02
2 24.49%  $            85.72
3 17.49%  $            61.22
4 12.49%  $            43.72
5 8.93%  $            31.26
6 8.92%  $            31.22
7 8.93%  $            31.26
8 4.46%  $            15.61
Table 2
A B C D E F Year 0
Year Cash from Revenue in $Millions Cash outflow, expenses in $Millions Depreciation in $Millions Taxable Income in $ Millions Tax  in $Millions 27.5% rate After tax Cash Flow In $Millions
0  $                   – $370.42  $ (370.42)  $ (101.87)  $ (268.56) land 4,424,000
1  $      1,800.00  $      1,728.00  $    50.02  $      21.99  $        6.05  $      65.95 Factory 350,000,000
2  $      1,900.00  $      1,824.00  $    85.72  $      (9.72)  $      (2.67)  $      78.67 Cash Receivable 17,000,000
3  $      2,000.00  $      1,920.00  $    61.22  $      18.79  $        5.17  $      74.83 Inventory 14,000,000
4  $      2,100.00  $      2,016.00  $    43.72  $      40.29  $      11.08  $      72.92 cash outflow 31,000,000
5  $      2,200.00  $      2,112.00  $    31.26  $      56.75  $      15.60  $      72.40 accounts payable 15,000,000
6  $      2,300.00  $      2,208.00  $    31.22  $      60.78  $      16.71  $      75.29 cash inflow 15,000,000
7  $      2,400.00  $      2,304.00  $    31.26  $      64.75  $      17.80  $      78.20 working capital -16,000,000
8  $      2,500.00  $      2,400.00  $    15.61  $      84.39  $      23.21  $      76.79
9  $      2,600.00  $      2,496.00  $   104.00  $      28.60  $      75.40 Total Investment in year 0 370,424,000
10  $      2,700.00  $      2,592.00  $   108.00  $      29.70  $      78.30
11  $      2,600.00  $      2,496.00  $   104.00  $      28.60  $      75.40
12  $      2,500.00  $      2,400.00  $   100.00  $      27.50  $      72.50 year 21
13  $      2,400.00  $      2,304.00  $      96.00  $      26.40  $      69.60 recovered net working capital 16,000,000
14  $      2,200.00  $      2,112.00  $      88.00  $      24.20  $      63.80 Land, factory and equipments 21,000,000
15  $      2,000.00  $      1,920.00  $      80.00  $      22.00  $      58.00 Total cash received in year 21 37,000,000
16  $      1,800.00  $      1,728.00  $      72.00  $      19.80  $      52.20
17  $      1,500.00  $      1,440.00  $      60.00  $      16.50  $      43.50
18  $      1,200.00  $      1,152.00  $      48.00  $      13.20  $      34.80
19  $          800.00  $          768.00  $      32.00  $        8.80  $      23.20
20  $          400.00  $          384.00  $      16.00  $        4.40  $      11.60
21  $            37.00  $      37.00  $      10.18  $      26.83
NPV $612.92 The project should be accepted since the NPV is greater than zero hence a potential profit of $624.99 will be made
IRR 27% Also, the IRR (27%) is greater than the risk free rate (3%) and the cost of debt (4%)
Table 3
A B C D E F
Year Cash from Revenue in $Millions Cash outflow, expenses in $Millions Depreciation in $Millions Taxable Income in $ Millions Tax  in $Millions 27.5% rate in years 1 , 2, 3 and 50% there after After tax Cash Flow In $Millions
0  $                   –  $          377.83  $           –  $ (377.83)  $ (103.90)  $ (273.93)
1  $      1,800.00  $      1,762.56  $    50.02  $   (12.57)  $      (3.46)  $      40.90
2  $      1,900.00  $      1,860.48  $    85.72  $   (46.20)  $   (12.70)  $      52.22
3  $      2,000.00  $      1,958.40  $    61.22  $   (19.62)  $      (5.39)  $      46.99
4  $      2,100.00  $      2,056.32  $    43.72  $      (0.04)  $      (0.02)  $      43.70
5  $      2,200.00  $      2,154.24  $    31.26  $      14.50  $        7.25  $      38.51
6  $      2,300.00  $      2,252.16  $    31.22  $      16.62  $        8.31  $      39.53
7  $      2,400.00  $      2,350.08  $    31.26  $      18.67  $        9.33  $      40.59
8  $      2,500.00  $      2,448.00  $    15.61  $      36.39  $      18.20  $      33.81
9  $      2,600.00  $      2,545.92  $           –  $      54.08  $      27.04  $      27.04
10  $      2,700.00  $      2,643.84  $           –  $      56.16  $      28.08  $      28.08
11  $      2,600.00  $      2,545.92  $           –  $      54.08  $      27.04  $      27.04
12  $      2,500.00  $      2,448.00  $           –  $      52.00  $      26.00  $      26.00
13  $      2,400.00  $      2,350.08  $           –  $      49.92  $      24.96  $      24.96
14  $      2,200.00  $      2,154.24  $           –  $      45.76  $      22.88  $      22.88
15  $      2,000.00  $      1,958.40  $           –  $      41.60  $      20.80  $      20.80
16  $      1,800.00  $      1,762.56  $           –  $      37.44  $      18.72  $      18.72
17  $      1,500.00  $      1,468.80  $           –  $      31.20  $      15.60  $      15.60
18  $      1,200.00  $      1,175.04  $           –  $      24.96  $      12.48  $      12.48
19  $          800.00  $          783.36  $           –  $      16.64  $        8.32  $        8.32
20  $          400.00  $          391.68  $           –  $        8.32  $        4.16  $        4.16
21  $            37.00  $                   –  $           –  $      37.00  $      18.50  $      18.50
NPV $154.71
IRR 12%
Considering the working in part 3 and part 5, the project is can be said to be profitable
This is because the NPV is greater than zero and the IRR is greater than both the Cost of ebt and the risk free rate
However, the project is highly risky.
The changes in expenses and tax rates led to a decrease in NPV from $612.92 to $154.71 and a decrease in IRR from 27% to 12%.

Capital Budgeting Techniques Case Study

academicessayist.com

Capital Budgeting Techniques Case Study

RUBRIC

QUALITY OF RESPONSE NO RESPONSE POOR / UNSATISFACTORY SATISFACTORY GOOD EXCELLENT
Content (worth a maximum of 50% of the total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 20 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates poor understanding of the relevant material by failing to address or incorrectly addressing the relevant content; failing to identify or inaccurately explaining/defining key concepts/ideas; ignoring or incorrectly explaining key points/claims and the reasoning behind them; and/or incorrectly or inappropriately using terminology; and elements of the response are lacking. 30 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates a rudimentary understanding of the relevant material by mentioning but not full explaining the relevant content; identifying some of the key concepts/ideas though failing to fully or accurately explain many of them; using terminology, though sometimes inaccurately or inappropriately; and/or incorporating some key claims/points but failing to explain the reasoning behind them or doing so inaccurately.  Elements of the required response may also be lacking. 40 points out of 50:  The essay illustrates solid understanding of the relevant material by correctly addressing most of the relevant content; identifying and explaining most of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology; explaining the reasoning behind most of the key points/claims; and/or where necessary or useful, substantiating some points with accurate examples.  The answer is complete. 50 points:  The essay illustrates exemplary understanding of the relevant material by thoroughly and correctly addressing the relevant content; identifying and explaining all of the key concepts/ideas; using correct terminology explaining the reasoning behind key points/claims and substantiating, as necessary/useful, points with several accurate and illuminating examples.  No aspects of the required answer are missing.
Use of Sources (worth a maximum of 20% of the total points). Zero points:  Student failed to include citations and/or references. Or the student failed to submit a final paper. 5 out 20 points:  Sources are seldom cited to support statements and/or format of citations are not recognizable as APA 6th Edition format. There are major errors in the formation of the references and citations. And/or there is a major reliance on highly questionable. The Student fails to provide an adequate synthesis of research collected for the paper. 10 out 20 points:  References to scholarly sources are occasionally given; many statements seem unsubstantiated.  Frequent errors in APA 6th Edition format, leaving the reader confused about the source of the information. There are significant errors of the formation in the references and citations. And/or there is a significant use of highly questionable sources. 15 out 20 points:  Credible Scholarly sources are used effectively support claims and are, for the most part, clear and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition is used with only a few minor errors.  There are minor errors in reference and/or citations. And/or there is some use of questionable sources. 20 points:  Credible scholarly sources are used to give compelling evidence to support claims and are clearly and fairly represented.  APA 6th Edition format is used accurately and consistently. The student uses above the maximum required references in the development of the assignment.
Grammar (worth maximum of 20% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 5 points out of 20:  The paper does not communicate ideas/points clearly due to inappropriate use of terminology and vague language; thoughts and sentences are disjointed or incomprehensible; organization lacking; and/or numerous grammatical, spelling/punctuation errors  10 points out 20:  The paper is often unclear and difficult to follow due to some inappropriate terminology and/or vague language; ideas may be fragmented, wandering and/or repetitive; poor organization; and/or some grammatical, spelling, punctuation errors 15 points out of 20:  The paper is mostly clear as a result of appropriate use of terminology and minimal vagueness; no tangents and no repetition; fairly good organization; almost perfect grammar, spelling, punctuation, and word usage. 20 points:  The paper is clear, concise, and a pleasure to read as a result of appropriate and precise use of terminology; total coherence of thoughts and presentation and logical organization; and the essay is error free.
Structure of the Paper (worth 10% of total points) Zero points:  Student failed to submit the final paper. 3 points out of 10: Student needs to develop better formatting skills. The paper omits significant structural elements required for and APA 6th edition paper. Formatting of the paper has major flaws. The paper does not conform to APA 6th edition requirements whatsoever. 5 points out of 10: Appearance of final paper demonstrates the student’s limited ability to format the paper. There are significant errors in formatting and/or the total omission of major components of an APA 6th edition paper. They can include the omission of the cover page, abstract, and page numbers. Additionally the page has major formatting issues with spacing or paragraph formation. Font size might not conform to size requirements.  The student also significantly writes too large or too short of and paper 7 points out of 10: Research paper presents an above-average use of formatting skills. The paper has slight errors within the paper. This can include small errors or omissions with the cover page, abstract, page number, and headers. There could be also slight formatting issues with the document spacing or the font Additionally the paper might slightly exceed or undershoot the specific number of required written pages for the assignment. 10 points: Student provides a high-caliber, formatted paper. This includes an APA 6th edition cover page, abstract, page number, headers and is double spaced in 12’ Times Roman Font. Additionally, the paper conforms to the specific number of required written pages and neither goes over or under the specified length of the paper.
Capital Budgeting Techniques Case StudyGET THIS PROJECT NOW BY CLICKING ON THIS LINK TO PLACE THE ORDER Grinning Face on Microsoft Windows 10 May 2019 Update

CLICK ON THE LINK HERE:  https://phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow

Also, you can place the order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow / www.phdwriters.us/orders/ordernow
Do You Have Any Other Essay/Assignment/Class Project/Homework Related to this? Click Here Now [CLICK ME] and Have It Done by Our PhD Qualified Writers!!

Share your love

Newsletter Updates

Enter your email address below and subscribe to our newsletter

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Related Posts