Developing a program plan outline

COMMUNITY PROGRAM PLAN: PART 2
DEVELOPING A PROGRAM PLAN OUTLINE
INSTRUCTIONS
After reviewing the assigned readings for the course to date, you will:
1. Identify your priority community diagnosis.
2. Use thediagnosis selected to serve as the basis for developing your community intervention plan.
3. Reference Box 12.2 in your text as a guide and develop an outline that includes the following content areas:
• Executive summary
• Introduction
• Goals
• Objectives
• Program
• Intervention
• Resources and constraints
• Budget
• Appendices
4. Be very detailed in the development of this outline. Refer to resources that are provided and that are related to the content outline development. You will use this assignment as a frame of reference for the development of your final program plan document in NURS 633.
5. Support your work with evidence from 3–5 scholarly sources in addition to the course textbook. References must have been published within the past 5 years. The outline must be a full sentence, alpha-numeric outline that is 2–3 pages (excluding the title page and reference page).

You may reference owl.english.purdue.edu for specific formatting guidance.

Submit the Community Program Plan Part 2: Developing a Program Plan Outline by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module/Week 4.

COMMUNITY PROGRAM PLAN: Part 2GRADING RUBRIC

Criteria Levels of Achievement
Content 70% Advanced Proficient Developing Not Present
Community
Diagnosis 8 to 10 points
Provides a comprehensive discussion of the priority community diagnoses from your community assessment. Be very specific and identify why this diagnoses was prioritized over the others.

The following applies to this and each of the following content-related categories of this rubric:
Major points are supported with evidence from scholarly sources. At least 3 scholarly sources are required in addition to the course textbook and the Bible. References must have been published within the past 5 years. 6 to 7 points
Provides a somewhat detailed discussion of the community diagnoses. Be very specific and identify why this diagnosis was prioritized over the others.

The following applies to this and each of the following content-related categories of this rubric:
Major points are somewhat supported with evidence from scholarly sources and/or there is a minimal discrepancy in the required number and/or type of references utilized within the paper. References must have been published within the past 5 years.
1 to 5points
Provides a limited discussion of the community diagnoses. The discussion lacks specificity and does not clearly identify why the diagnosis was prioritized over the others.

The following applies to this and each of the following content-related categories of this rubric:
Major points lack support from scholarly sources and/or there is a significant discrepancy in the required number and/or type of references utilized within the paper. References must have been published within the past 5 years. 0 points
Not Present
Outline 57 to 60 points
Provides a comprehensive, well-developed, full-sentence, alpha-numeric outline that includes the following content areas:

Executive summary
Introduction
Goals
Objectives
Program
Intervention
Resources and constraints
Budget
Appendices (optional, if needed to provide support for the project) 21 to 56 points
Outline is missing one of the specified content areas and/or lacks detail in one or two of the following content areas:

Executive summary
Introduction
Goals
Objectives
Program
Intervention
Resources and constraints
Budget
Appendices (optional, if needed to provide support for the project)
1 to 20points
Outline is missing more than one of the specified content areas and/or lacks detail in more than two of the following content areas:

Executive summary
Introduction
Goals
Objectives
Program
Intervention
Resources and constraints
Budget
Appendices (optional, if needed to provide support for the project) 0 points
Not Present
Structure 30% Advanced Proficient Developing Not Present
Writing Quality 18 to 20points
Quality of work includes: clarity and thoroughness of writing, grammar, varied sentence structure, evidence of critical thinking, and proper use of current APA format. 15 to 17 points
Quality of work has several errors in:clarity and thoroughness of writing, grammar, sentence structure, critical thinking, and use of current APA format.
1 to 14 points
Quality of work has substantial errors in:clarity and thoroughness of writing, grammar, sentence structure, critical thinking, and use of current APA format.
0 points
Not Present

Format 9 to 10 points
Assignment format is a thorough and well-developed outline. 7 to 8 points
Assignment format is a mostly complete, relatively well-developed outline.
1 to 6 points
Assignment is incomplete and/or lacks detail in the development of the outline and/or is submitted in narrative (paper) format. 0 points
Not Present