Literature Review- Health related topic

Description

You can choose a research topic of interest (preferably health-related- for your own future benefit ) and conduct a review of the literature.
You have to select approximately 10-12 peer-reviewed articles (7 years or under) using a different database/ sources
This assessment task has 3 sections: 1. creation of a Flow chart that represents how the literature search was conducted including the inclusion / exclusion criteria,
2. Table: the final selected papers represented in a table format highlighting the following aspects; author/year/country, methodology, participants, key findings, CASP score of that particular article also can be included in your table
And 3. Discussion section outlining the findings of the literature review. Word limit is 2000 words.

Marking Guide Assessment task 2 – Literature review
Presentation 0 points 1 point 2 points 3 points 4 points 5 points
PRESENTATION
Structure
Presentation displayed
no clear structure and
sequence. Did not
follow the assessment
guidelines.
Moderate structure
and/or sequence of
presentation. Poorly
followed the
assessment guidelines.
Presentation required a
more clear structure/
sequence, and/or better
linking dialogue
between information.
Presentation displayed a
clear structure and
sequence – introduction,
body, and conclusion,
references Linking dialogue
provided.
Presentation displayed a
good structure and
sequence –introduction,
body, and conclusion,
references Linking
dialogue provided.
Presentation
displayed excellent
structure and
sequence –
introduction, body,
and conclusion,
references Linking
dialogue provided.
PRESENTATION
Fluency
Format of presentation
was poor with no
fluency between,
themes or information.
Format required greater
attention to ensure the
presenter, themes or
information flowed.
Format required more
attention to ensure the
presenter, themes or
information flowed.
Format of presentation
flowed at times, themes
and information.
Format of presentation
flowed most of the
time, appropriate
themes and mostly
relevant information.
Format of
presentation flowed
at all times, with
sound themes and
relevant information.
RESEARCH
QUESTION
Not present Present but not well
defined
Present slightly
explained
Present with some
demonstration of thought
when using a PICO
approach
Present with good
demonstration of
thought when using a
PICO approach
Present with
excellent
demonstration of
thought when using a
PICO approach
CONTENT
Literature table
No understanding of
the task demonstrated.
No links or connections
made between ideas.
Information was
irrelevant and poorly
expressed.
Poor understanding of
the task demonstrated.
Links and connections
between ideas unclear.
A lot of information was
irrelevant or poorly
expressed.
Minimal understanding
of the task
demonstrated.
Numerous links and
connections between
ideas unclear. Some
information was
irrelevant or not well
expressed.
Moderate understanding
of the topic demonstrated.
Some links and
connections between ideas
unclear. Most information
was relevant.
Substantial
understanding of the
task demonstrated.
Links and connections
between ideas generally
clear. Information was
relevant.
Excellent
understanding of the
task demonstrated.
Links and
connections between
ideas made clear.
Information was
relevant and well
expressed.
CONTENT
Use of CASP tool
No evidence of the use
of the CASP tool
CASP tool mentioned CASP tool mentioned
and demonstrated
CASP tool used to critique
papers and scores present
in table
CASP tool critique is
demonstrated well
throughout table
CASP tool critique is
demonstrated well
and explained
CONTENT
Literature flow chart
Flow chart was absent,
did not follow the
assessment guidelines
for this task.
The flow chart was
poorly constructed, with
little evidence of a
logical sequence.
The Flow chart showed
some detail and logical
sequence.
The Flow chart showed
moderate detail and logical
sequence.
The Flow chart showed
good sound detail and
logical sequence.
The Flow chart
showed excellent
detail and logical
sequence.
CONTENT
Discussion
Findings section was
absent, did not follow
the assessment
guidelines for this task.
The findings section was
poorly constructed, with
little evidence of a
logical sequence.
The findings section
showed some detail and
logical sequence.
The Findings section
showed moderate detail
and logical sequence.
The Findings section
showed good sound
detail and logical
sequence.
The Findings section
showed excellent
detail and logical
sequence.
CONTENT
Critique
No critique of the
literature
Literature is poorly
critiqued
Some attempt at
critique of the literature
was made
The literature has been
critiqued with some
attempt at linking the
papers together
The literature has been
critiqued well with some
attempt at papers
linked together
An excellent
literature critique
with an link between
papers demonstrated
STRUCTURE
Professional Prose
Inconsistent levels of
articulation or
expression, numerous
spelling and
grammatical errors and
lack of
sentence/paragraph
structure makes paper
difficult to
read/understand.
Poor level of articulation
and expression, with
sentence or paragraph
structure unclear,
and/or extensive
spelling or grammatical
errors.
Minimal level of
articulation and
expression, with some
sentence or paragraph
structure unclear,
and/or a considerable
number of spelling or
grammatical errors.
Moderate level of
articulation and
expression, with some
sentence or paragraph
structure unclear, and/or a
number of spelling or
grammatical errors.
Substantial level of
articulation and
expression, with clear
and concise sentence
and paragraph
structure, and minimal
spelling or grammatical
errors.
Excellent level of
articulation and
expression, with
clear and concise
sentence and
paragraph structure,
and no spelling or
grammatical errors.
REFERENCES
APA Style and
credibility
No references cited. Incorrect APA
referencing style for intext citations quotes
and/or references.
Numerous errors noted
in APA referencing of intext citations, quotes or
references. Some
references are NOT
reputable, current,
extensive or relevant.
A couple of errors noted in
APA referencing of in-text
citations, quotes or
references. A number of
references are reputable,
current, extensive and
relevant
In-text citations and
quotes and referencing
are in APA style of a
sound quality. Most
references are
reputable, current,
extensive and relevant
All in-text citations,
quotes and
references are in APA
style of a very high
quality. All
references are
reputable, current,
extensive and
relevant.