Theory, Research and Nursing Practice Paper

Description

Introduction

5.0 pts
5 Points
The introduction clearly states the paper’s purpose and is engaging/thought provoking. The introduction clearly describes and states the main topic and previews the structure and content of the paper.

3.0 pts
3 Points
The introduction lacks clarity in stating the papers purpose and/or lacks clarity in stating the main purpose and/or does not adequately preview the structure of the paper.

0.0 pts
0 Points
Incomplete or unfocused purpose statement. There is not clear introduction of the main topic and/or the structure of the paper is missing.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked

o a Learning Outcome Theory, research and nursing practice

15.0 pts
15 Points
Clearly discusses the relationships between theory, research and nursing practice.

12.0 pts
12 Points
Lacks some clarity in discussing the relationships between theory, research and nursing practice

6.0 pts
6 Points
Discussing the relationships between theory, research and nursing practice is vague or inaccurate.

0.0 pts
0 Points
Very disorganized/did not follow directions on discussing the relationships between theory, research and nursing practice.

15.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Frist Conceptual Model

10.0 pts
10 Points
Selects an appropriate conceptual model and summarized the purpose of the theory and the key concepts.

7.0 pts
7 Points
Selects an appropriate conceptual model but summarizing the purpose of the theory and key concepts lacks clarity.

5.0 pts
5 Points
Selected an appropriate conceptual model but summarizing the purpose of the theory and the key concepts is vague or inaccurate.

0.0 pts
0 Points
Did not select appropriate conceptual model. Or did not follow directions on summarizing the purpose of theory and the key concepts.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Second Conceptual Model

10.0 pts
10 Points
Selects an appropriate conceptual model and summarized the purpose of the theory and the key concepts.

7.0 pts
7 Points
Selects an appropriate conceptual model but summarizing the purpose of the theory and key concepts lacks clarity.

5.0 pts
5 Points
Selected an appropriate conceptual model but summarizing the purpose of the theory and the key concepts is vague or inaccurate.

0.0 pts
0 Points
Did not select appropriate conceptual model. Or did not follow directions on summarizing the purpose of theory and the key concepts.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Compare/Contrast

10.0 pts
10 Points
Clearly and effectively compared and contrasted the 2 conceptual models. Identified 2 similarities and 2 differences between the conceptual models.

7.0 pts
7 Points
Lacks some clarity in comparing and contrasting the 2 conceptual models and/or lacked clarity in identifying 2 similarities and 2 differences between the models.

5.0 pts
5 Points
Comparing and contrasting the 2 conceptual models and identifying 2 similarities and 2 differences is vague or inaccurate.

0.0 pts
0 Points
Very disorganized/did not follow directions on comparing and contrasting the 2 conceptual models.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Application of Conceptual Model

10.0 pts
10 Points
Accurately described how they can use one of chosen conceptual models to assist in their nursing practice

6.0 pts
6 Points
Lacks clarity in describing how they can use one of the chosen conceptual models to assist in their nursing practice.

0.0 pts
0 Points
Does not describe how they can use one of the chosen conceptual models to assist in their nursing practice

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Research on using Conceptual Model

10.0 pts
10 Points
Effectively summarizes 1 article of the use of one of the chosen Conceptual Models in practice utilizing nursing research.

6.0 pts
6 Points
Lacks clarity in summarizing 1 article of the use of one of the chosen Conceptual Models in practice utilizing nursing research.

0.0 pts
0 Points
Does not summarize an article of the use of one of the chosen Conceptual Models in practice utilizing nursing research in paper.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Conclusion

5.0 pts
5 Points
Effectively summarizes the main points of the paper

3.0 pts
3 Points
Lacks clarity in concluding the main points of the paper

0.0 pts
0 Points
Does not effectively summarize the main points of the paper or no conclusion evident.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Resources used in paper

5.0 pts
5 Points
Based on minimum of 6 resources. Using a minimum of 2 articles referenced from current (last 7 years) peer reviewed journals.

3.0 pts
3 Points
Missing 1 resource

0.0 pts
0 Points
Missing 2 or more resources.

5.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome Professional writing

10.0 pts
10 Points
Content 9-10 pages in length Writing is accurate, clear, concise & organized. No spelling, grammatical, language, punctuation or sentence structure errors.

8.0 pts
8 Points
Content 9-10 pages in length. Less than 4 errors in professional writing.

5.0 pts
5 Points
Content 7-8 pages in length and/or 5-6 errors in professional writing.

0.0 pts
0 Points
Content less than 7 pages and/or Unprofessional Writing OR – Frequent spelling or grammatical errors OR – Generally unclear, disorganized.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome APA Format

10.0 pts
10 Points
Consistent adherence to APA criteria in title page, citations, reference page, titles, running head, page numbers and headings. Font, layout and/or margins follow APA format.

8.0 pts
8 Points
Minimal APA errors in title page, citations, reference page, titles, running head, pages, headings, font, layout and/or margins that do not distract from content or readability.

5.0 pts
5 Points
Several errors in title page, citations, references page, titles, running head, pages, headings, font, layout and/or margins that are minimal distractions but do not affect overall flow and readability.

0.0 pts
0 Points
Major problems with implementation of APA with title page, citations, reference page and headings. Font layout and/or margins do not follow APA format which affect flow/readability

10.0 pts