Who Brought All These Cookies? Managing How Others Sabotage our Health

Description

Who Brought All These Cookies? Managing How Others Sabotage our Health, please?

This is a powerpoint and attached are the details:

Much has been written about keeping our patients safe, but what about keeping ourselves safe? Should healthcare providers have a safe place to work? Should healthcare providers take lunch breaks each shift, where they truly can take a short walk and rid themselves of stress? Should healthcare providers have adequate staffing and equipment to provide safe quality care to their patients, and themselves?

To address these and other issues, the American Nursing Association (ANA) has adopted the Healthy Nurse, Healthy Nation™ program (although this program is certainly applicable to all healthcare providers). Students can learn more by clicking here (Links to an external site.). NOTE: This assignment is NOT specific to the nursing profession. Instead, it is appropriate for all disciplines represented within this course. The source listed here is simply one example of programs.

For this assignment, students are to create a PowerPoint presentation on a topic of keeping providers healthy. The topic was selected during Week One of this course.

Introduction

Clearly identify the topic
Specify why this topic is important for the healthcare providers

Significance of the Topic

Include the healthcare provider’s responsibility for role modeling this behavior (to other providers and/or their patients)
Include how this topic impacts the lifespan of the working healthcare provider.

Strategies for implementation

Discuss at least three practical strategies for implementation.

References/EBP

Minimum of three healthcare-specific scholarly references (look for peer-reviewed articles; avoid websites). References must be listed on the final slide and within the presentation slides where content is cited.

Scholarly Work

Appropriate spelling/grammar/punctuation as appropriate for an electronic presentation.
Creative presentation with logical flow
Rubric
Healthy Provider Teaching Presentation
Healthy Provider Teaching Presentation
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeIntroduction
*Clearly identify the topic *Specify why this topic is important for the healthcare providers
7.5 pts
Exceptional – Student clearly identified the topic, and specified why the topic is important for healthcare providers. Evidence of critical thinking was included. The topic discussed was the topic approved by Faculty earlier in the course. Information was submitted in the form of a PowerPoint presentation.
5.75 pts
Satisfactory – This category may be selected if some of the required criteria were omitted. Perhaps all the criteria were discussed but with less evidence of critical thinking as listed in the “Exceptional” category. Perhaps the information was submitted in a format other than PowerPoint.
3.75 pts
Minimal – This category may be selected if there is no evidence of critical thinking. Perhaps this information was off-topic. Perhaps most of the required criteria were not addressed.
0.0 pts
No Marks – Assignment was not submitted or this section was omitted.
7.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeSignificance of the Topic
*Include the healthcare provider’s responsibility for role modeling this behavior (to other providers and/or their patients) *Include how this topic impacts the lifespan of the working provider.
10.0 pts
Exceptional – Student clearly and thoroughly discussed the healthcare provider’s responsibility for role modeling this behavior (to other providers and/or their patients) regarding how to overcome the problem. The student clearly and thoroughly discussed how this topic impacts the lifespan of the working healthcare provider. Evidence of critical thinking was included. Information was submitted in the form of a PowerPoint presentation.
7.5 pts
Satisfactory – This category may be selected if some of the required criteria were omitted. Perhaps all the criteria were addressed but evidence of critical thinking was limited. Perhaps the information was submitted in a format other than PowerPoint.
5.0 pts
Minimal – This category may be selected if there is no evidence of critical thinking. Perhaps this information was off-topic. Perhaps most of the required criteria were not addressed.
0.0 pts
No Marks – Assignment was not submitted or this section was omitted.
10.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeStrategies for Implementation
*Discuss at least three practical strategies for implementation.
20.0 pts
Exceptional – The student clearly and thoroughly discussed at least three practical strategies for implementation. Evidence of critical thinking was included. Information was submitted in the form of a PowerPoint presentation.
15.0 pts
Satisfactory – This category may be selected if some of the required criteria were omitted. Perhaps all the criteria were addressed but evidence of critical thinking was limited. Perhaps the information was submitted in a format other than PowerPoint.
10.0 pts
Minimal – This category may be selected if there is no evidence of critical thinking. Perhaps this information was off-topic. Perhaps most of the required criteria were not addressed. Perhaps only one or no strategies were discussed.
0.0 pts
No Marks – Assignment was not submitted or this section was omitted.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeReferences/EBP
*Project includes all material needed to give a good understanding of the topic. *The project is consistent with teaching the concept of being a “Healthy Provider.”
7.5 pts
Exceptional – Minimum of three healthcare-specific scholarly references were utilized. References listed on the final slide and within the presentation where appropriate. References cited per APA 6th ed, and published within the past five years.
5.75 pts
Satisfactory – This category may be used if only two references were included. Perhaps three references were included but did not meet the required criteria as stated within the “Exceptional” category. Perhaps some errors in APA citations were noted.
3.75 pts
Minimal – This category may be selected if the references were not scholarly, healthcare focused, or outdated. Perhaps no references were provided at all. Perhaps citations were omitted or significant errors in APA (citations) were evident.
0.0 pts
No Marks – Assignment was not submitted or this section was omitted.
7.5 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeScholarly Work
*Minimum of three healthcare-specific scholarly references. *References will be listed on the final slide and within the presentation where appropriate. *Appropriate spelling/grammar/puncture as appropriate for an electronic presentation. *Creative presentation with logical flow
5.0 pts
Exceptional – The student included appropriate spelling/grammar/punctuation as appropriate for an electronic presentation. Creative presentation with logical flow.
3.75 pts
Satisfactory – This category may be used if some errors in spelling/grammar/punctuation (as appropriate for a PowerPoint presentation) were noted. Perhaps the presentation lacked creativity or had some difficulty with flow.
2.5 pts
Minimal – This category may be selected if there were significant errors in scholarly writing. Perhaps the presentation was choppy and illogical.
0.0 pts
No Marks – Assignment was not submitted or this section was omitted.
5.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCommunication
view longer description
threshold: 3.0 pts
5.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
3.0 pts
Meets Expectations
0.0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
—
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDecision Making
view longer description
threshold: 3.0 pts
5.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
3.0 pts
Meets Expectations
0.0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
—
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeDiscovery
view longer description
threshold: 3.0 pts
5.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
3.0 pts
Meets Expectations
0.0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
—
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeLife Span Development
view longer description
threshold: 3.0 pts
5.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
3.0 pts
Meets Expectations
0.0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
—
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeRole Development
view longer description
threshold: 3.0 pts
5.0 pts
Exceeds Expectations
3.0 pts
Meets Expectations
0.0 pts
Does Not Meet Expectations
—
Total Points: 50.0