PROFESSIONAL ACADEMIC STUDY RESOURCES WEBSITE 
+1 813 434 1028 
proexpertwritings@hotmail.com
Case study
Description
The subject of your case study should be relevant to this course. The course is interactive media and society. The class discusses digital footprints,defining communities, social capital, engaged citizens, brand communitty, copyright, Hacktivism,contributing to a movement, thriving culture, etc
It should be about 2000 words long. You can find the resources on how to conduct a case study at https://www.monash.edu/student-academic-success/excel-at-writing/how-to-write/case-study and https://libguides.usc.edu/writingguide/assignments/casestudy
Submit a case study on a topic related to interactive media that have been discussed in class. Conduct your research using 8 academically appropriate sources. The case study should be 2000 words longs.
| Criteria | Requirements | Weight (out of 100%) | Excellent | Good | Basic | Poor | |
| 1 | Identification of the main problems and issues | From three to five problems or issues | 10% | Understands and identifies all the major problems in the case study. | Understands and identifies the bigger part of the key problems in the case study. | Understands and identifies some of the major problems in the case study. | Understands and identifies a few of the major problems in the case study. |
| 2 | Review and literature research | The bigger part of references and articles must be within ten years; 8 academically appropriate sources | 15% | Great research with clear associations between questions or problems and main course concepts. Good use of relevant sources. | Good research and documented associations between questions or problems and main concepts. Some use of relevant sources. | Limited research and associations between questions or problems and main concepts. Little use of relevant sources. | Incomplete research and associations between the issues or problems and main concepts. Relevant sources are not used. |
| 3 | Analysis of the main issues | All problems must be analyzed. | 25% | Thorough and insightful analysis of all the main problems. | Thorough and insightful analysis of most of the main problems. | Thorough and insightful analysis of some of the main problems. | The analysis of the main problems is incomplete. |
| 4 | Alternative options or solutions | It is critical to provide a method of comparison between options. | 20% | All the main issues are covered by alternatives with a method to evaluate all of them equally. | Most of the main problems are covered by alternatives with a method to evaluate. | Some of the main problems are covered by alternatives with a method to evaluate. | The analysis of alternatives is incomplete. There is no evaluation method. |
| 5 | Recommendations and observations on effective solutions | It must include both short and long-term recommendations. There must also be realistic time frames, responsibilities, and an appropriate evaluation program. | 20% | Logical, well-reasoned, relevant observations and recommendations on suitable solutions to most issues or problems. | Well-thought-out, solid observations and recommendations on solutions to many of the issues or problems. | Shallow recommendations and observations on effective solutions to a few of the issues or problems. | Superficial recommendations and observations to effective solutions to a few of the issues or problems. |
| 6 | Professional presentation/ writing skills | Includes overall structure, composition, grammar, punctuation, and grammar. | 10% | Writing is totally free of spelling and grammar errors. Concise, clear, and creative presentation of ideas. Properly referenced. | Contains a few grammatical or spelling errors. The bigger part of the ideas is clearly presented. References are utilized. | There are several grammatical or spelling errors. Some ideas are presented clearly. References are not used or irrelevant. | There are a lot of grammatical and spelling errors. Ideas are not easy to follow. There are no references. |