conduct a comparative, component and parametric analysis.

Description

1. Read each question—there may be more than one.
2. Post your responses in the appropriate threads. Students are required to make their initial post by Thursday at 11:59 p.m. (Pacific Time). You should respond to two posts of your colleagues by 11:59 pm on Sunday night.
3. Responses should be of sufficient length with proper grammar.
4. You will not be able to view your classmates’ responses until you post in the discussion.
5. Respond to at least two of your classmates’ postings with each question. Responses are due by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. (Pacific Time). You will lose marks if you do not satisfy the minimum number of posts. This feature will keep you engaged. Your response to your colleagues should be at least one full paragraph each (at least 4-5 sentences) for each post.
6. Review your postings to see who has responded to you.
7. Be sure to answer all questions.
8. Include a bibliography using APA format. If you do not include a bibliography utilizing at least two different sources, you will lose marks.
9. Document all your sources in the initial discussion post using APA format. Your initial post should look like a research paper where you document all your sources. For example, if you provide a definition of a principle, be sure to document your source in the sentence like this:

“Cooper, Heron, Heward (2020) outline the definition of positive reinforcement as….”

or

“The definition of positive reinforcement is…. (Cooper, Heron, Heward, 2020).”

• Explain how you would conduct a comparative, component and parametric analyses during data analysis. Provide an example of each one.CriteriaMeet StandardsDoes Not Meet StandardsCriterion ScoreWriting Competency: Grammatical structure, APA formattingExemplary spelling and grammar. Precise use of words with meaning clearly expressed. Feedback is supported by citing textual references from course materials in APA formatting.Minor errors in grammar or format. Acceptable, effective use of words and expression.Errors in grammar or format frequently obscure expression of thought. Ineffective wording, sentence structure, and expression./ 1Critical Thinking: Skills evident: knowledge, comprehension, application, synthesis, evaluationHigher order thinking is clearly evident and presented in a clear logical flow. Insightful interpretation, application, explanation, and/or critiqueSome higher order thinking is evident. Organization is logical. Links need strengthening. Most ideas are clearly interpreted, applied, explained and/or critiquedBasic knowledge level information is presented. Organization is not evident. Interpretation, application, explanation and/or critique are not evident./ 1GrammarAdds clear insights to ongoing discussion. Responds to a minimum of two others. Timely responses. Asks probing, constructive questions. Includes liberal and natural use of “encouraging statements.”Contributes further thought to discussion in a timely way. Limited use of “encouraging statements.” Responds to two others.Contribution is late and therefore not able to add to discussion. Respect of others is lacking. Does not respond to others. Post is late./ 1TotalScore of Discussion Board Rubric,/ 3Overall ScoreExceeds Standards3 points minimumMeet Standards1.5 points minimumDoes Not Meet Standards