Political Science Question

Description

In this response paper, you will critically analyze the reading. The paper should be 3-4 pages in length. In this paper, you will argue for or against a thesis found in the reading, utilizing relevant evidence to support your argument. The documents will be uploaded and only use those as a source. Here I will also provide the rubric. Please only use these two uploaded sources. MAKE SURE TO FOLLOW THE RUBRIC AND NO US OF (AI). Need it very fast.

This below would help you

the document titled “Peripheral Realism Revisited” explores the concept of “Peripheral Realism” (RP) as a theoretical framework for understanding the international relations of weaker states, particularly in the context of Latin America under unipolarity. The thesis argues that weaker states should adopt strategies focused on economic development and citizen welfare rather than pursuing costly levels of autonomy that could hinder their political and economic stability.

Summary of Key Points:

• Peripheral Realism (RP) argues that weaker states should focus on their citizens’ well-being and economic growth rather than seeking full autonomy in international relations.
• Hegemonic Influence: Under a dominant power, peripheral states should avoid confrontational strategies unless directly aligned with their national interests.
• Guidelines: Emphasizes economic development, avoiding unnecessary confrontations, and potentially aligning with dominant powers (bandwagoning).
• Historical Examples: Draws comparisons between Latin American countries’ experiences and those of West Germany and Japan under U.S. influence.
• Case Studies: Reviews strategies of countries like Argentina, Chile, and Colombia in maximizing their relationships with the U.S. for economic benefit.
• Critique of Realism: Challenges traditional international relations theories for ignoring complexities faced by peripheral states.
• Predictions: Suggests that stable countries can adopt more contestational strategies, while unstable ones tend to align with dominant powers.
• Future Implications: RP provides guidance for Latin American foreign policies, emphasizing citizen welfare in a changing global landscape.