PROFESSIONAL ACADEMIC STUDY RESOURCES WEBSITE +1 813 434 1028  proexpertwritings@hotmail.com

Political Science Question

Description

Firist: Please write a three pages as a reaction memo about the reading. please no summery instead try to make critical analysis, see what the connection between the reading pick three or four reading or maybe more as you like but not less than 3

Second: come up with two questions from any reading and write them in the head of the paper. if you want you can answer one of the questions in the memo if not you do not have to just write the two question in the head of the paper then do the memo.

Please do not talk about USA

please no using for AI or Grammarly or other stuff like that at all

the course is international security (you do not have to write that in the paper this is just for you to know)

The reading of the week is: Security Regimes and Institutions : Contending Theoretical Approaches

Introduction

Robert Jervis, “Security Regimes,” IO 36:2 (spring 1982), pp. 357-378

David A. Lake, “Beyond Anarchy: The Importance of Security Institutions,” IS 26:1 (summer 2001), pp. 129-160.

Debate: Realism vs. Liberal Institutionalism

John J. Mearsheimer, “The False Promise of International Institutions,” IS 19:3 (1994), pp. 5-49

Keohane, Robert O., and Lisa L. Martin. “The promise of institutionalist theory.” International security 20.1 (1995): 39-51.

  1. John Ikenberry. “Institutions, strategic restraint, and the persistence of American postwar order.” International security23.3 (1998): 43-78

Randall Schweller. “The problem of international order revisited: A review essay.” International Security 26.1 (2001): 161-186.

=====================================================================

please write about Debate: Realism vs. Liberal Institutionalism

Share your love

Newsletter Updates

Enter your email address below and subscribe to our newsletter

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *