How is ”YGB” as either Faerie Tale or as Cautionary Tale. Do not use the elements of Walt Disney. Better to use rules of Grimm Brothers, and/or older sources

Description

Please do not write an under-developed plot summary; it needs to be a literary criticism.

How is ”YGB” as either Faerie Tale or as Cautionary Tale. Do not use the elements of Walt Disney. Better to use rules of Grimm Brothers, and/or older sources
COLLAPSE

How is ”YGB” as either Faerie Tale or as Cautionary Tale. Do not use the elements of Walt Disney. Better to use rules of Grimm Brothers, and/or older sources

Hint:

Investigate the meaning of allegory before you answer “YGB” questions. A dictionary meaning will not suffice. Neither will an encyclopedia. You need a literary definition and the elements of allegory to respond more accurately and meaningfully. Pyramid Production film version is very helpful. You should be able to find it in local libraries. In addition, you can ask MBCC librarians if they can help you locate it.

Thread:

How is ”YGB” as either Faerie Tale or as Cautionary Tale?

Quote the sources and the short story to support your allegations.
Do not use a dictionary or encyclopedia
use college material for better insights and arguments.
Must be double spaced
Please be sure to separate your thoughts into Academic and Subjective.
Works cited because must be in MLA.
Required three literary critics. Must use actual citations in MLA of a bare minimum of 3 literary critics
DO NOT USE A PASSIVE VOICE. Passive voice either has no subject and active verb or it has a subject where the object should be and a object where the subject should be — in other words, it is backward.
Underline the thesis.
highlight transitions to help organize ideas and guide the reader.

who can use — no subject. who presented? what work — missing info/passive voice that does not clarify. What is the manner that evokes — name it. Capitalize title of the narrative and put in quotes.
Refer to the author by his First name not middle or last name.
No paraphrases allowed.
Paper requirements:

ü establishes a clear underlined thesis in paragraph one of the Introduction that stresses what the writer is arguing. Should be 1 to 5 complete sentences. On rare occasion, depending on topic, and length of paper, may be longer. This is typical of papers of 25 pages or more

ü offers relevant, organized evidence that follows the elements in the order the thesis presents them

ü is clearly written with varied sentence structure, effective transitions, and vivid but academically appropriate language

ü contains very few (if any) small grammatical/syntax/spelling errors, none

of which distract from the writer’s meaning or the reader’s understanding

ü is free of serious errors such as passive voice

ü follows MLA style for literature papers and MLA or APA style according to Lester. A free copy is in Blackboard.

ü consistently shows in-depth & increasing grasp of content & ability to apply it to analysis

ü supports claims with high quality expert, college level sources

ü consistently demonstrates solid command of compositional techniques, structure & grammar

ü consistently employs strong active-reading/study skills

ü is not passive, general, vague

ü submits work on time

ü consistently participates and is productive to class discussions & projects, including

constructive interaction with other students.

ü often goes beyond analysis to higher levels of critical thinking on Bloom’s Taxonomy and/or based on Neil deGrasse Tyson’s concepts of critical thinking and how to think

ü skillfully uses more than the required minimum of 3 quality, college level experts in the subject area

ü Follows all directions

ü Contains at least one counter argument which the writer/presenter seamlessly interweaves into the text by using appropriate transitions, segues, enumerations, correlatives, signal words

ü Demonstrates the author’s familiarity with interdisciplinary approaches to the subject matter