Reading Analysis

Description

Reading Analysis #3
Submit Assignment
Due Sep 20 by 11:59pm Points 50 Submitting a file upload

To assess your understanding of the reading, you are to respond to the following questions about Chapters 4 and 5 (pages 55-71) in the Donaldson text.

How do archetypes function in systems?
Discuss how the six most common elements of management models and frameworks interact in a system thinking mindset.
How does throughput function in system thinking?
Discuss what Senge means when he claims, “systems thinking is the discipline that integrates other disciplines? (Refer to Week 1’s material as well as you consider your answer). Be specific.

Your responses to the set of questions should be at least 600-700 words long (3 pages) and must cover all questions assigned that week. Develop full paragraph/short theme answers as appropriate for each question. Copy the questions into a Word document and provide your thoughts for each question. Grades will be based on completion and correct understanding of the reading.

Assignment 1 Deadline: Responses due by Sunday at 11:59 p.m. Addresses learning objectives #1, 2, and 3.

Rubric
ORGL510 Reading Analysis Rubric
ORGL510 Reading Analysis Rubric
Criteria Ratings Pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Content Development

10.0 pts
Exceptional
Content is entirelyaccurate and is presented clearly and logically.

8.0 pts
Skillful
Content is presented clearly and logically, but points do not necessarily build on each other.

6.0 pts
Average
Content is somewhat clear and logical but the points are not well connected.

4.0 pts
Weak
Content is rambling, and there are prompts left unaddressed.

2.0 pts
Unacceptable
There is no discernable focus with content.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Use of support

10.0 pts
Exceptional
Each point is backed up by one or more examples.

8.0 pts
Skillful
Each point is backed up by one or more examples.

6.0 pts
Average
Most points are backed up by one example.

4.0 pts
Weak
Several points are left without examples supporting them.

2.0 pts
Unacceptable
A few examples are thrown in here or there, but not used well to defend main points made.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Analysis

10.0 pts
Exceptional
Thoroughly analyzes information carefully evaluating it.

8.0 pts
Skillful
Analysis is mostly clear and appropriate for understanding concepts.

6.0 pts
Average
Some analysis of information is evident with portions of information copied from the reading.

4.0 pts
Weak
Analysis is largely undetectable with information appearing to only be copied from the reading.

2.0 pts
Unacceptable
Clear analysis of key point is missing.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Organization

10.0 pts
Exceptional
Each question’s answer has an organization that is clear with a natural flow.

8.0 pts
Skillful
Each question’s answer has an organization that is mostly clear but writing is not always fluid.

6.0 pts
Average
Each question’s answer has an organization that has some clarity but is not wholly clear.

4.0 pts
Weak
Each question’s answer has an organization that is unclear.

2.0 pts
Unacceptable
Little discernable organization to question answers is detected.

10.0 pts

This criterion is linked to a Learning Outcome
Writing Style/Mechanics

10.0 pts
Exceptional
There are no grammar or spelling errors.

8.0 pts
Skillful
There are a few grammar or spelling errors.

6.0 pts
Average
There are several grammar, punctuation, or spelling errors.

4.0 pts
Weak
Significant grammar or spelling errors (but not both).

2.0 pts
Unacceptable
Significant grammar and spelling errors.

10.0 pts

Total Points: 50.0