Caring for the Nguyens

Caring for the Nguyens
Review the opening scenario of Nam Nguyen in the front of this book. Imagine you are the clinic nurse at the Family Medicine Center. Based on the information presented in the scenario, work through the following questions:
Patient Situation
Why is Mr. Nguyen at the clinic? What are his wife’s concerns? Are they similar to or different from his? Critical Thinking How do I go about getting the data I need? What sources should I use? Are my data congruent? What is one possible explanation for what is happening in this situation?
Nursing Knowledge
What type of nursing knowledge (theoretical, practical, ethical, or self-knowledge) is needed to answer the following questions? What health concerns does Mr. Nguyen have that should be addressed by the healthcare team? What is the role of Zach Miller on the healthcare team? What role will you play in the care of Mr. Nguyen?
Nursing Process
In what phase of the nursing process are you engaged when you are asking Mr. Nguyen about the reason for his visit? What activities are involved in the diagnosis phase? In planning outcomes? In planning interventions? Why would you not, at this point, be using the evaluation phase?
Rubric
NUR 215 Caring for the nguyens rubric (5)
NUR 215 Caring for the nguyens rubric (5)
Criteria Ratings Pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeCritical thinking skills 25.0 pts
Level 4
Questions are logically answered with feasible and acceptable interventions backed by primary, scholarly/peer-reviewed literature. 15.0 pts
Level 3
Questions are answered with feasible and acceptable interventions , linked with 1 literature (non-primary, peer reviewed) 10.0 pts
Level 2
Questions are answered however interventions are unfeasible or not acceptable. Literature not fully linked or inappropriate. 5.0 pts
Level 1
Questions are mostly unanswered or interventions do not apply. 0.0 pts
Level 0
Assignment not turned in/past due date.
25.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeContent 20.0 pts
Level 4
Responded to assignment questions with knowledge and insight from literature. 12.0 pts
Level 3
Responded to assignment questions with knowledge and insight. Some details missing or 1 question not fully answered. 8.0 pts
Level 2
Responded to questions with insight not linked to literature. 2-3 questions not answered completely. 4.0 pts
Level 1
Used opinion to answer questions rather than facts from literature. 4+ questions left unanswered or incomplete. 0.0 pts
Level 0
Assignment not turned in/past due date.
20.0 pts
This criterion is linked to a Learning OutcomeGrammarly and Scholarly Composition 5.0 pts
Level 4
Students are articulate and no grammatical errors are noted. Correct APA with references 3.0 pts
Level 3
Students are articulate with 1-2 grammatical errors noted. Correct APA format with reference 2.0 pts
Level 2
Students missing transitions and flow. 3-4 grammatical errors noted. Mostly APA format with reference 1.0 pts
Level 1
Student writing difficult to follow. Many grammatical (4+) errors noted. Incorrect APA format no references 0.0 pts
Level 0
Assignment not turned in/past due date.
5.0 pts