PROFESSIONAL ACADEMIC STUDY RESOURCES WEBSITE +1 813 434 1028  proexpertwritings@hotmail.com

. 3/3/22, 9:21 PM PAPER ASSIGNMENT #1

https://ciam.instructure.com/courses/632/assignments/11623?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fciam.instructure.com%2Fcalendar%23view_name%3Dmo… 1/7

PAPER ASSIGNMENT #1

Due Feb 18 by 11:59pm Points 100 Submitting a text entry box, a website url, a media recording, or a file upload

Start Assignment

Connected: The amazing power of social networks and how they shape our lives” (https://www.edu-apps.org/lti_public_resources/?tool_id=youtube#/youtube/search/details/HwbX4HUOdE8)

Individual Written Assignment 1 CLOs #3, 5, & 7

To start, watch the video below…

Connected: The amazing power of social networks and how they shaConnected: The amazing power of social networks and how they sha……

https://www.edu-apps.org/lti_public_resources/?tool_id=youtube#/youtube/search/details/HwbX4HUOdE8

3/3/22, 9:21 PM PAPER ASSIGNMENT #1

https://ciam.instructure.com/courses/632/assignments/11623?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fciam.instructure.com%2Fcalendar%23view_name%3Dmo… 2/7

Address the following:

1. Explain the value of diverse perspectives in the process of innovation. 2. How is this related to the concept of strong versus weak ties? 3. Why do most large organizations seem to have trouble coming up with and implementing

innovations? 4. If you were running a large organization, how would you make sure that innovative thinking was not

only “safe,” but encouraged? Why is it important to make it “safe to fail”? (See Slide 5 of the Lesson 3 Power Point)

VIDEO (Click on Link): In connection with (4), please view the following short TED talk by Shimpei Takahashi. (https://www.ted.com/talks/shimpei_takahashi_play_this_game_to_come_up_with_original_ideas) (https://www.ted.com/speakers/shimpei_takahashi)

In addition to the course readings and lectures (which you may cite along with other sources), you should use LIRN to find at least one additional article related to this topic. One is provided for you (Russel and Russel [1992] in the Readings for Lessons 3 and 4.

The full reference is as follows (Click on Link below):

Takahashi, S. (2015, March). Play this word game to come up with original ideas. (https://www.ted.com/speakers/shimpei_takahashi)

(https://www.ted.com/speakers/shimpei_takahashi) (https://www.ted.com/speakers/shimpei_takahashi)

Deliverables

The paper should be 6-8 pages long. It should include at least 4 citations, using APA rules. Use 12-pt Times New Roman font and upload it here to your Canvas platform, Paper Assignment #1. Be sure to view the rubric to see how your paper will be graded.

General Guidelines

https://www.ted.com/speakers/shimpei_takahashi
https://www.ted.com/speakers/shimpei_takahashi
https://www.ted.com/speakers/shimpei_takahashi
https://www.ted.com/speakers/shimpei_takahashi

3/3/22, 9:21 PM PAPER ASSIGNMENT #1

https://ciam.instructure.com/courses/632/assignments/11623?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fciam.instructure.com%2Fcalendar%23view_name%3Dmo… 3/7

Most classes have a 2 paper requirement per course. Please be sure to address the following requirements when completing your papers:

The cover page and reference page/s are not included in the above-stated page requirement. These should be in addition to page requirements. Papers need to be formatted in proper APA 7th Edition style. Each paper requires a minimum of at least three outside peer-reviewed sources for your references (unless stated otherwise in the guidance above).

o Acceptable/credible sources include: Academic journals and books, industry journals, and the class textbook. To include additional types of sources, please review the “Guidelines for finding and utilizing required references for your paper,” shared below.

Using your textbook is highly recommended to demonstrate that you have read the required material and/or are connecting new thoughts to the course text/learnings.

Guidelines for finding and utilizing required references for your paper:

For a formal research paper, you are required to locate, understand, and integrate a certain number of peer reviewed journal articles and/or published books, as these are considered reliable and valid sources of information by academics and industry. The best source of these articles is to search through your CiAM Library (LIRN). However, if you find a website you would really like to share in your paper, you can do so if it is NOT counted as one of your reliable/valid articles/books (i.e., goes above and beyond the required amount of reliable/valid sources), and if it is NOT the basis/foundation of your paper. Otherwise, there is no way to demonstrate that: 1. You have done true research and have given the appropriate level of thought to your paper; and 2. There is no way to validate that the information you have received off of the internet has been fact checked.

Here are some guidelines on how to think about this process:

1. Using Wikipedia: This internet source is very popular, and although there may be some great articles found there, there is no formal process (at this point) for what is posted to be fact checked. Meaning, what you find there is not always true. However, if you read an interesting article, you can go to their references, check on who they researched, then go to that ORIGINAL work (locate it in our library), and then read through that article and reference that article (not Wikipedia). If you want to cite Wikipedia, you may do so if it follows the guidelines shared above (i.e., is NOT the basis of your paper, and is just a supplemental share going above and beyond the minimum required reliable/valid works). You may also simply visit Wikipedia just to get more general information on a subject before you start your formal research process).

2. General informational websites and business websites: These follow the same rules as shared above.

3/3/22, 9:21 PM PAPER ASSIGNMENT #1

https://ciam.instructure.com/courses/632/assignments/11623?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fciam.instructure.com%2Fcalendar%23view_name%3Dmo… 4/7

Individual Research Paper Grading Rubric

Plagiarism

According to www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/plagiarized (https://www.merriam- webster.com/dictionary/plagiarized)

PLAGARIZE: transitive verb (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/transitive) : to steal and pass off (the ideas or words of another) as one’s own : use (another’s production) without crediting the source intransitive verb (https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/intransitive) : to commit literary theft : present as new and original an idea or product derived from an existing source

With this said, it is very important to show backing for your thought, so if you are summarizing/paraphrasing another’s work, cite that work, or any work that shows backing for your thought directly after you have written it. Each paragraph starts over when citing, so remember that citing in one paragraph does not cover your reference requirements for your whole paper.

Also, if you quote more than 3 words in a row that are exactly the same as your source, be sure to add in quote marks around those words, then add the page or para# with the rest of the reference citation at the end of the quote mark. Your APA 7 Edition guide is an excellent resource. It is highly recommended that you own one. Our Librarian and/or our Writing Tutors are also very helpful and FREE! Be sure to utilize the CiAM tutor, tutor@ciam.edu (mailto:tutor@ciam.edu) , if you are needing support with grammar before you submit your paper. This is an incredible resource and can make the difference between earning an A or a lower grade. Once your paper is reviewed by the tutors, make the recommended changes and then submit your paper to your course before the due date.

th

https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/plagiarized
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/transitive
https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/intransitive

mailto:tutor@ciam.edu

3/3/22, 9:21 PM PAPER ASSIGNMENT #1

https://ciam.instructure.com/courses/632/assignments/11623?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fciam.instructure.com%2Fcalendar%23view_name%3Dmo… 5/7

Criteria Ratings Pts

20 pts

30 pts

Organization

20% 20 to >18.0 pts Excellent

Written work progresses logically and ideas are well- developed and cohesive. There is a clear beginning, middle and end. Paragraphs are well developed; transitions are seamless

18 to >16.0 pts Good

Written work progresses logically and ideas are fairly complete. Transitions between paragraphs and ideas are occasionally missing or incomplete. Paragraphs are not consistently cohesive; However, the reader can follow the paper’s flow.

16 to >14.0 pts Needs Improvement

Written work often does not progress logically and ideas are often not fully formed. Transitions between paragraphs and ideas are often missing or incomplete. Lack of cohesion within paragraphs makes it difficult to follow the paper’s flow.

14 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Requirements Written work lacks logical flow and ideas are not fully formed. Transitions are not visible. Paragraphs are not cohesive, and the reader cannot follow the flow of the paper. No organization apparent.

Content

30% 30 to >27.0 pts Excellent

Demonstrates strong or adequate knowledge of the materials; correctly represents knowledge from the readings and sources.

27 to >24.0 pts Good

Some significant but not major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

24 to >21.0 pts Needs Improvement Major errors or omissions in demonstration of knowledge.

21 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Requirements

Fails to demonstrate knowledge of the materials. No knowledge of material.

3/3/22, 9:21 PM PAPER ASSIGNMENT #1

https://ciam.instructure.com/courses/632/assignments/11623?return_to=https%3A%2F%2Fciam.instructure.com%2Fcalendar%23view_name%3Dmo… 6/7

Criteria Ratings Pts

30 pts

10 pts

Research

30% 30 to >27.0 pts Excellent

Sources or examples meet required criteria, are scholarly and are well chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination. Clear use of LIRN or other research databases

27 to >24.0 pts Good

Sources or examples meet required criteria but are less‐than adequately chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

24 to >21.0 pts Needs Improvement Sources or examples meet required criteria and are poorly chosen to provide substance and perspectives on the issue under examination.

21 to >0 pts Does Not Meet Requirements

Source or example selection and integration of knowledge from the course is clearly deficient. Few or no sources used.

Writing and Grammar

Share your love

Newsletter Updates

Enter your email address below and subscribe to our newsletter

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *